Beyond the Firewall (White paper)

Networking/Security Forums -> Firewalls // Intrusion Detection - External Security

Author: ComSec PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2002 5:09 pm    Post subject: Beyond the Firewall (White paper)
Beyond the Firewall :Using a layered security strategy to address internal security threats

The Internet has become a key tool for business communication and information sharing, and many
organizations would cease to function if e-mail and Web access was denied for any significant
period. All Internet Content you read, send, and receive carries a risk. The number of potential
security risks has increased at the same time that dependence on information technology has grown,
making the need for a comprehensive security program even more important. Likewise, the job of
those persons tasked with network security, often system administrators, has never been harder.

The number of reported security incidents continues to grow and there is little indication that this
trend will improve at any time in the near future. In 2001, there were 52,658 reported incidents. By
the end of the first quarter of 2002 there were already 26,829 incidents reported. A reported incident
can be as simple as a single computer being compromised or as severe as a complete network
compromise involving hundreds of client computers. The number of reported security vulnerabilities
has continued to grow at the same alarming rate with 2,437 vulnerabilities reported in 2001 and
1,065 reported by the end of Q1 2002

Unfortunately, many companies have stopped short of implementing a more secure “layered”
approach to network security and have chosen to rely solely on the firewall/virus scanner approach.
While firewalls and virus protection are necessary, by themselves they address only one portion of
potential security risks and may contribute to a false sense of security. A more complete approach
integrates these technologies with other effective tools including Web and e-mail filtering, intrusion
detection, PKI, and artificial intelligence tools. Advanced tools can automate many tasks and
increase the efficiency of a security program while reducing demand on network administrators.


Major Threats to Networks

Experts discover new security vulnerabilities almost every day. These newly discovered
vulnerabilities may be due to flaws in software or they may be the result of software configuration
errors. Hackers or other malicious individuals can exploit these vulnerabilities to gain access to
network assets. Administrators must spend a lot of time and energy just staying informed about and
dealing with new vulnerabilities. Often the result is that they are unable to take the time to monitor
and educate staff. Enforcement of security policies may be non-existent or rely on the honor system.
Failure to defend against the key threats to data and network assets can result in disaster.

Employee Behavior

Companies can face significant risk due to the behavior of their employees. Whether malicious or
accidental, security incidents due to insiders are becoming more frequent. Insiders may present a
more likely threat to many organizations than an attack by hackers or other malicious outsiders.
Often even when internal security compromises occur, many organizations decide not to report the
incidents due to fear of negative publicity. Failure to address employee behavior as part of internal
network security leaves an organization exposed in a variety of ways.

Employees accessing offensive or illegal material from a company’s network can leave the
organization exposed to litigation. Employees visiting porn sites or sites with other offensive content
create a hostile work environment, affect morale and may lead to costly litigation. If personnel access
illegal material, such as child pornography, an organization may be held liable, have network assets
seized in an investigation, and suffer negative publicity.

Millions of people subscribe to free webbased e-mail services such as Hotmail and Yahoo! mail.
Allowing personnel to access webbased e-mail accounts from a corporate intranet increases the risk
of damage to data and assets by a virus. While an organization may scan for viruses at its e-mail
gateway, employees downloading attachments from web-based accounts circumvent this protection
and may unwittingly receive and execute malicious code.

Software downloaded from the Internet and installed without consent poses a threat. Employees may
inadvertently create a security hole by using ICQ or chat software. Disgruntled personnel can
download and install hacking software that may allow them to circumvent security and delete or steal
data. Downloaded games can contain malicious code, and illegal copies of software (warez) can
result in fines and litigation.

Employees can negatively affect productivity of the entire organization by abusing or misusing e-mail
to forward jokes, chain letters, or perpetuating hoaxes. Organizations can be liable for forwarding of
material that is threatening, harassing, defamatory or that violates HR policies. Companies must
educate employees about security and IT policies to avoid many of these problems. Usually this
burden to instruct and notify personnel falls upon IT staff, adding to their workload and frustration.
Advanced tools automate these and other functions, freeing IT to do other projects.

Disgruntled employees may share intellectual property or competitive information with the press or
with the competition. Customer lists, proprietary data, financial data, research, and other types of
confidential information are also vulnerable. Employees can easily undermine a company’s
competitive edge with a few forwarded e-mails.

Consider employee behavior a prime risk when designing a layered security program. The potential
damage done by an insider is often considerably greater than the risk posed by an external threat.
Later we will discuss tools that will mitigate these risks and make management of the program easier
and more efficient.


E-mail is definitely the Internet’s “killer app” or the application that has driven adoption of the Internet
to the greatest degree. Most people depend heavily upon e-mail, and many organizations could not
operate effectively without it. While employee behavior can account for the majority of serious abuse,
it is not the only threat to this resource.

Unsolicited commercial e-mail and unwanted junk mail or spam can quickly fill up inboxes and be an
excessive burden to e-mail resources. It is often difficult to stop spam despite attempts to legislate
against it. Employees should be discouraged from posting or using their work e-mail addresses for
Internet shopping or special offers.

Many new Internet worms exploit bugs in Microsoft Outlook and other SMTP e-mail servers to
replicate and spread from inbox to inbox. Virus Scanners at the gateway can minimize the risk but
may not always intercept new viruses. Instruct personnel to avoid opening unidentified or suspicious
e-mail attachments.


Viruses and other malicious code can be devastating to network assets, data, and productivity. Each
year, viruses grow more sophisticated and programmers that create malicious code are creating
more viruses, worms and Trojans that take advantage of and exploit software vulnerabilities. The
“Code Red” and “Klez” worms are recent examples of this trend.

Almost as damaging to productivity are the numerous virus hoaxes. Well meaning employees
forward warnings for non-existent viruses to other members of the organization as well as friends
and family, compounding the problem of this false information, wasting mail server resources and
creating an additional burden for IT staff that must respond. Perpetuation of virus hoaxes can be
limited or stopped by addressing employee behavior in your security program and using the proper
screening tools.

A hacker is an individual with a great deal of technical knowledge about computer systems and their
security. Originally, the term had no negative connotations; in fact, it was a compliment in recognition
of a great deal of technical prowess. Today, the term is frequently applied to cyber-criminals, to the
dismay of legitimate hackers. Hackers prefer to call criminal hackers “crackers” and wish that the
press would do the same.

Hackers are the most publicized threat to enterprise security. Hackers make great headlines and
companies have spent millions of dollars improving existing security programs or creating new ones
in reaction to the threat. While malicious outsiders are a risk to an enterprise, in comparison to other
risks faced by an organization, it is less likely that an outsider will compromise network assets.
Focusing entirely on hackers may lead an organization to overlook a more likely threat, that of an
insider compromising security intentionally, due to mistakes, or through negligence. Even in cases
where an outsider actually penetrates network security, more often than not, someone within an
organization has enabled the attack intentionally or through negligence. Adding additional layers of
security that complement firewalls and virus protection will allow an organization to mitigate internal

Assessing risk to your organization

The majority of companies would privately admit that their IT security is not as comprehensive as it
should be. Security policies and procedures are often far behind technological advances, and
adequate staff education is rare and infrequent. In fact, many organizations only develop or update
policies and procedures in reaction to a security compromise. As a result, many companies are
vulnerable, despite spending large sums on security products and consultants. A more proactive
approach involves identifying risks specific to your organization and regularly auditing to address
known risks and deal with new risks proactively rather than reactively.

Before an organization can protect something, it has to know that it is at risk. It is impossible to plan
for the security of assets if you do not know the threats against them. Risk analysis is a process of
identifying assets that need protection and evaluating the threats against those assets. Risk analysis
can be simplified and broken down into five steps:

1. Identify assets
2. Determine the value of each asset and identify the cost associated with its loss
3. Identify threats to the asset
4. Determine the vulnerability to those threats
5. Prioritize assets by level of importance

Following these steps, you can identify assets that are at risk and plan for their protection. Do not
overlook the possibility of threats from within your organization. Too often, organizations emphasize
external threats, specifically hackers and viruses, and ignore the more likely threats from within an
organization. The majority of threats come from within a company and recent trends demonstrate

Sources of insider security problems include malicious action, negligence, disdain of security
practices, and ignorance of security policy and practices. 4 Misuse of computer systems by
employees may result in liability if they use internal systems to access illegal or offensive material, or
to commit computer crime. Intentional or accidental public dissemination of sensitive information can
result in lawsuits or loss of revenue. Laws concerning protection of privacy data make monitoring
employee behavior more important than ever before.

How does your organization address internal network security? What is the liability involved if your
organization’s data is compromised? Your level of exposure to internal risks will dictate the steps
you must take to mitigate the risks. A security policy and program must include steps to mitigate the
risks from disgruntled employees, risk of liability due to employee behavior or damage to systems
from employee error. As mentioned before, the job of enforcing the policy and educating personnel
usually falls upon the shoulders of an already burdened IT staff. Automated security tools can inform
and enforce, making a security program more efficient while reducing the cost in man-hours.
Inside Attacks Examined

Recent surveys indicate that security breaches originating from within an organization may account
for up to 80% of all incidents. These same surveys indicate the losses suffered from an external
intrusion amount to $60,000.00 on average and that the average “inside job” cost in excess of $2.7

The risk from within certainly seems to outweigh the seemingly more dangerous threat posed by
hackers. An insider often has the motive, knowledge and opportunity to do far greater harm to IT
assets than any outsider. A hacker must spend a great deal of time and effort to gain significant
intelligence on a well-protected network. An insider has intimate knowledge due to their position in
the company and can often compromise security or destroy data even after they no longer have
physical access to the network. Consider this threat a prime risk to network security; the following
real world examples demonstrate why.

The Saboteur

On July 31, 1996 a software “time-bomb” went off on the primary file server of Omega Engineering’s
Bridgeport N.J. manufacturing plant. The malicious program deleted manufacturing programs that
Omega depended on to conduct business causing them to lose an estimated $10 million in business
and $2 million in programming costs in order to resume business. Omega engineering suffered loss
of market share, and had to lay off many employees. Even now, it is still recovering from the

Tim Lloyd, a systems administrator who worked at Omega for over 11 years, wrote the software
“time-bomb.” He had intimate knowledge of the network and critical systems and was able to use
that knowledge to cripple his former employers. Lloyd, a trusted and loyal employee, had access to
senior management. As Omega grew, he became disgruntled at his own loss of influence and
eventually lost his job. This apparently prompted his act of sabotage, and no procedures were in
place to protect against an individual with his access damaging the systems from within.

A jury convicted Lloyd and a Federal Judge sentenced him to 41 months in federal prison and $2
million in restitution, but the damage inflicted upon his former employers can never be undone.
Omega has put security systems in place to mitigate the risk of future sabotage, and multiple backup
systems to provide for recovery of data. However reacting to a security incident has certainly cost
Omega far more than a proactive security program would have ever cost.

The Leaked E-mail

In Okinawa, Japan, the United States Marine Corps was embarrassed when an anonymous
employee leaked the contents of an e-mail message sent by Lt. General Hailston to the local press.
Relations between the U.S. Military and the citizens of Okinawa were already strained due to several
incidents involving U.S. Marines, including the rape of an Okinawan schoolgirl by three marines. Lt.
General Hailston conveyed his thoughts about local Okinawan officials in his e-mail. “I think they are
all nuts, and a bunch of wimps,” he stated in his e-mail. Of course, this aggravated an already
volatile situation, and damaged relations between the U.S.M.C and the people of Okinawa even

In this case, a single forwarded e-mail further damaged public relations and cast the U.S. Military in a
bad light both in Japan and the United States. A proactive content security program may have
prevented a sensitive (or insensitive) communication from compromise.
Dealing with new threats

New threats to networked computers appear almost daily. Hackers may discover weaknesses in
software and post these exploits on several websites.There is a good and a bad side to this
activity. The good side is that the information is available to everyone and security personnel or
system administrators can act to secure computers with the security hole. The bad side is that the
information is available to everyone and malicious hackers can attempt to use it to exploit and gain
access to systems before system administrators patch them.

Often the threats are variants of previous threats, i.e. modified worms and viruses, in which case
they will take advantage of known weaknesses in operating systems or applications. This
underscores the need for personnel to stay aware of software vulnerabilities that may affect their
systems and update software accordingly. Security applications that automate updates to their own
databases can significantly improve efficiency in this regard by assuming responsibility for this task
and freeing IT personnel for more important duties.

Beyond Firewall and A/V technology

The first and last word in security for many companies is firewall. Many administrators regard the
firewall as a magic bullet that will somehow make their networks impervious to risk. A firewall is a
necessary and important part of any security program; it can limit access to your private network
from the public Internet, as well as divide your internal network into zones thus limiting employee
access to network areas that they require to perform their jobs. However, a firewall by itself cannot
effectively deal with the majority of insider threats.

The second ingredient in the most popular security programs is anti-virus software. With the
proliferation of viruses, worms and other malicious programs, anti-virus software is also a necessary
part of network security. Even a simple e-mail worm (i.e. the Love Bug) can waste bandwidth and
crash mail servers, or entire networks. Some worms, such as the Code-Red worm and its variants,
inflicted unexpected collateral damage upon many networked print and storage devices, causing
them to crash or hang despite the fact that it did not target these devices specifically. Properly
maintained and updated anti-virus software can go a long way in protecting a network from this
damage but insiders can intentionally, or inadvertently, circumvent anti-virus applications leaving
your network vulnerable.

As prevalent as the firewall/anti-virus security model is, alone it cannot adequately protect
organizations from the risk of an external attack and does little to provide security against malicious
insiders. The answer to this problem is the addition of security layers using advanced tools that
complement the firewall/anti-virus approach while addressing the areas of greatest risk.

The Layered Approach

Using successive layers of protection allows an organization to provide adequate protection against
the majority of threats that it faces, thus minimizing risk. Implemented technologies should
complement one another, with one component addressing threats that other components do not, as
well as securing paths around (or through) other components. This comprehensive approach can
mitigate risk more effectively as well as improve the efficiency of the security program.

Take care to carefully select tools that perform the required functions without adding unnecessary
complexity to the system. Increased complexity often results in decreased security not in a more
secure network environment. Avoid unnecessary redundancy; this is not the goal of a layered
program, and may increase complexity or create conflict between components of the system. If one
anti-virus package is good, that does not mean that two running on the same gateway would be
better. Duplicating function would most likely result in conflict and wasted computing resources.
For an example of complementary technologies, we can look at anti-virus software and content
security using Web filtering. An anti-virus product installed on an e-mail gateway may provide
adequate protection from e-mail-borne viruses and malicious attachments. However, if employees
can access Web based e-mail accounts, they can circumvent this component and compromise the
network by downloading attachments.

A Web filtering solution can prevent employees from accessing Web based e-mail accounts, closing
this backdoor past the anti-virus solution.
This is the strength of a layered program: each component acts to protect the network against
specific threats while adding to the effectiveness of the other components. The different tools, like
layers of armor, work to exclude unauthorized access, and prevent compromises from within the

Select automated tools that will handle reporting as well as enforcement of the security policies. A
Web filtering tool that informs the user that they cannot access a specific website as well as notifying
the administrator of the attempt, saves time and allows fewer IT personnel to invest time monitoring
and educating employees. Real-time reporting is especially desirable because it allows an
administrator to detect and react to attempts to compromise security before they succeed.

An intrusion detection system (IDS) monitors systems and analyses network traffic to detect signs of
intrusion. An IDS can detect a variety of attacks in progress as well as well as attempts to scan a
network for weaknesses. An IDS can be a dedicated network appliance or a software solution
installed a host computer. A network intrusion detection system (NIDS) monitors all traffic on a
network segment and is most affective when use in conjunction with a firewall, placed near remote
access servers and on wide area network (WAN) backbones: although traffic on a WAN backbone
may be too fast for an individual NIDS to keep up with.

A NIDS/IDS can detect attempts to scan a network for intelligence gathering purposes. Hackers
often scan networks to detect services running on ports of specific hosts. This can allow a hacker to
identify the operating system of the host(s) and detect any exploitable services. There are many
types of port scanning applications. Some can bypass a firewall and attempt to scan hosts within a
private network. A NIDS/IDS can detect these stealth scans, complementing your firewall and
providing an added layer of security.

A NIDS/IDS may use anomaly detection to discover intrusion attempts. This involves monitoring
resource use, network traffic, user behavior and comparing it to normal levels. If a user that normally
only accesses the system between 9 am – 5pm, suddenly logs on at 3 am then this may indicate that
an intruder has compromised the user’s account. A NIDS/IDS would then alert administrators to the
suspicious activity.

Intrusion Detection Tools

PKI enables organizations to communicate securely using software, and services that rely on public
key encryption. PKI systems use digital certificates and digital signatures to identify parties in a
transaction, and allow for secure signing of messages, confidentiality of communication, and secure
remote access to network assets.

Public key encryption uses pairs of encrypted keys (public and private) to allow parties to
communicate securely. Using an individual’s public key, anyone can encrypt (scramble) a message
that can only be decrypted (unscrambled) by that person’s private key. A digital certificate is a digital
ID that certifies that a particular public key belongs to a specific individual or organization. PKI relies
on trusted third parties called certificate authorities (CA) that issue digital certificates to identify
individuals and organizations over a public network.

Much of the software already in daily use supports PKI, including browsers and e-mail clients.
Properly used PKI can secure remote access to systems, communications, and financial
transactions. Digital signing of software can ensure that software downloaded from the Internet has
not been tampered with and establish who wrote the software. Digital signatures can ensure the
integrity of a message so that recipients know that a third party has not altered it. By ensuring the
integrity of documents, digital signatures can satisfy legal requirements for non-repudiation in some

PKI can be an important part of a comprehensive security program but it is not a cure-all for security
woes. PKI solutions vary in complexity and no single approach is right for every organization. PKI
has its weaknesses and some PKI solutions are more secure than others are. By itself, PKI does not
adequately address the threat posed by malicious insiders.

Content security using filtering technology provides the key protection against risk due to employee
behavior and abuse of IT resources. Filtering solutions can protect an organization from employee
error including:

• Inadvertent disclosure of confidential or sensitive information
• Malicious compromise of information
• Compromise of information due to negligence
• Accessing illegal or offensive material
• Compromising security by downloading unauthorized software

Filtering solutions allow management to control who may access and distribute information. This
limits the amount of damage that individuals can do and aids in the enforcement of both security and
privacy policies. Even when an acceptable use policy (AUP) is in place, administrators often lack the
means to enforce it. Filtering solutions enable management to enforce security policies, privacy
policies and AUPs while managing staff productivity and minimizing wasted network bandwidth.

Content security

Web Filtering

Internet access is necessary for many employees, however abuse of this access can waste network
bandwidth, decrease productivity and expose an organization to legal liability. Internet Filtering
manages harmful and unnecessary Web and email content according to your policy. Web filtering
can increase the security of a network by preventing circumvention of other security software i.e.
anti-virus software via the Internet, and blocking the download of unauthorized or illegal software.
To maximize the benefits of a filtering solution, it is essential that the chosen solution is configurable
and gives administrators maximum flexibility in managing content security. Administrators must be
able to configure blocking by user and group. There is no such thing as a “one size fits all” policy,
and organizations differ in their need for blocking even between individual departments. A solution
that does not allow this level of customization will quickly outgrow its usefulness or worse,
administrators may circumvent it if it seems to be a burden.

Software should allow for blocking by file extension or true MIME type. This is extremely useful if
your staff collaborates on documents via the Web and you want to allow Microsoft Word and
PowerPoint documents, but not executable files or image files. Again, if the choice is all or nothing,
the result will be that administrators will block no files if the software prevents staff from doing their

Administrators should be able to define rules for blocking for maximum flexibility. Management can
pre-determine the level of trust for each employee or group of employees and allow selective
blocking based on employee need and level of trust. Flexibility is one of the most important factors
relating to acceptance of a filtering solution.

Automated reporting increases the efficiency of policy enforcement, allows management to stay
informed of employee activities and reduces the workload of administrators. Reports should be
customizable to allow for different information requirements and reporting to different levels of an
organization. Automatic scheduling of periodic reports as well as real-time notification and reporting
of abuses are essential and will increase the ROI of the program.

Many filtering applications block Web addresses based on a list of keywords or phrases. These
keywords may indicate obvious offensive or illegal material such as “porn,” “sex,” or words that are
more explicit. Keyword blocking is limited in its effectiveness and can result in over blocking or
erroneous exclusion of sites. An example of this would be a breast cancer site blocked because of
the word “breast” appearing on the page. Such obvious mistakes are rare as the technology has
improved but software that blocks based on keywords alone is insufficient as tool in an enterprise
security program.

Software intended for use in an enterprise security program will usually rely on an extensive
database maintained by real people in addition to blocking based on advanced A.I. and keyword
recognition. These databases consist of millions of sites pre-screened by professionals to determine
their content. The best solutions organize sites into groups and categories that allow administrators
to define access to very specific types of websites while blocking others. Due to the nature of the
Internet, updates to the database should be available frequently (daily is best).
By implementing content security through Web filtering an organization will minimize the risk of
litigation, reduce wasted network bandwidth, and improve productivity. The use of advanced
automated tools will increase the ROI, reduce the burden on IT staff, and improve the enforcement
and efficiency of security, AUP and privacy policies.

E-mail filtering

The second key component in the content security program is an e-mail filtering solution. Access to
e-mail is necessary for arguably every employee in a company. E-mail provides an efficient means
for all levels of the organization to communicate and collaborate on projects. However, abuse of email
will result in loss of productivity, exposure to liability, wasted bandwidth and an increased
burden on mail servers.

Often abuse of e-mail leads to the termination of personnel. In 1999, the New York Times fired 23
employees for sending inappropriate e-mail and the U.S. Navy disciplined over 500 sailors for
sending sexually explicit e-mail. 9 Clearly, an AUP or security policy will not enforce itself. Depending
of the honor system for enforcement increases risk and undermines the credibility of policies and

An e-mail filtering solution must allow managers to control which employees can e-mail particular
information, and to whom they may send it. The software should provide real-time monitoring and
quarantine of suspect messages. The software must be configurable to allow managers to review email,
remotely if necessary, and provide automated notification so that administrators can monitor

attempts to send unauthorized information or attachments.
Advanced text and content analysis is necessary to reduce the likelihood of users sending sensitive
information to unauthorized parties. Analysis should be customizable, and allow for examination of
attachments including those that are compressed (zipped files).
Solutions that allow for multiple dictionaries, are context sensitive, and include the ability to filter by
keyword and phrase will reduce the number of “false positive” alerts and increase the efficiency of
the system. Customization is key, as in Web filtering, and the solution that allows administrators the
most flexibility in determining rules will be the most successful.
E-mail filtering tools are the most reliable way to enforce e-mail procedures and policies, while
reducing the workload on IT staff. This is the best technology decision for mitigating the risk of
employee abuse of e-mail services and possible liability resulting from that abuse. Together with a
Web filtering product, an e-mail filter provides a complete solution to secure content in an
organization. Securing content is necessary to prevent incidents and liability due to employee


Perhaps the most overlooked threat in a security program is the threat posed by employee behavior.
As much as 80% of security compromises are the result of actions by an insider. Whether incidents
are due to malicious intent or inadvertent employee error, the result is the same: loss of revenue,
productivity and potential liability.

The threats to networks will only continue to grow. This is in part due to the increasing complexity of
enterprise systems, which results in greater possibility of unexpected interactions and software
faults. The ability of administrators to keep up with the growing number of threats is decreasing due
to increasing demands on their time. The only way to alleviate the burden on IT staff and increase
security at the same time is to implement a proactive security program that automates as many
functions as possible. Automated content security tools help to effectively and efficiently secure
network assets against threats from within an organization.

About SurfControl

This white paper was commissioned by SurfControl plc, the world's Number One Web and e-mail
filtering company. SurfControl is the only company in the security market offering a total content
security solution that combines Web and e-mail filtering technology with the industry's largest, most
accurate and relevant content database and adaptive reasoning tools to automate content
recognition. Analysts estimate double-digit growth in the security market with forecasts predicting it
will reach $14.6 billion by 2006.

SurfControl's Internet monitoring and policy management solutions are flexible, scaleable and
interoperable to meet the diverse needs of all its markets -- corporate, education, home and OEM.
SurfControl offers a choice of platform independent or integrated solutions, and the software can be
installed in any network environment. With world-class partners such as AT&T, Intel, Cisco and IBM,
as well as a customer base that includes many of the world's largest corporations, SurfControl offers
the most sophisticated yet easy to use technology, the best understanding of market needs and a
global reach unmatched in the industry. For further information and news on SurfControl, please visit
About the Author
Jack McCullough is a co-author of “Access Denied: The Complete Guide to Protecting Your
Business Online”, in addition to papers and articles about information security. He is the founding
consultant of Razorwire Information Security Consulting which provides cutting-edge computer
security expertise, threat assessment, training and security policy/program analysis and
development. He speaks regularly on the subject of information security and provides security
awareness training to all levels of management. He can be reached via email:
1. CERT Statistics:
2. Access Denied: the Complete Guide to Protecting Your Business Online, Cathy Cronkhite &
Jack McCullough, Osborne/McGraw-Hill Aug 2001, pg. 210
3. Insider Attacks: The Doom of Information Security Methods to thwart insider attacks, Anton
Chuvakin Ph.D. available at:
4. DoD Insider Threat Mitigation: Final Report of the Insider Threat- Integrated Process Team
pg1 executive summary
5. Insider Attacks: The Doom of Information Security Methods to thwart insider attacks, Anton
Chuvakin Ph.D. available at:
6. Computer Saboteur Sentenced to Federal Prison, Sharon Gaudin Network World Fusion
available at:
7. An example of a useful site for tracking exploits is:
8. Access Denied: the Complete Guide to Protecting Your Business Online, Cathy Cronkhite &
Jack McCullough, Osborne/McGraw-Hill Aug 2001, pg. 135
9. Access Denied: the Complete Guide to Protecting Your Business Online, Cathy Cronkhite &
Jack McCullough, Osborne/McGraw-Hill Aug 2001, pg. 51
10. Access Denied: the Complete Guide to Protecting Your Business Online, Cathy Cronkhite &
Jack McCullough, Osborne/McGraw-Hill Aug 2001, pg. 51

Networking/Security Forums -> Firewalls // Intrusion Detection - External Security

output generated using printer-friendly topic mod, All times are GMT + 2 Hours

Page 1 of 1

Powered by phpBB 2.0.x © 2001 phpBB Group